<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | Annie | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/31623940/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/31623940/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Annie.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 01:01:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bb1eb2938fc93ecec7e81b39bf1a290b</guid>
				<title>James Olson replied to the topic  &#034;Who Should Be Responsible for Quality: Engineers or Dedicated QA/QC Teams?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/58853/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:21:47 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jfm23/' rel="nofollow ugc">@jfm23</a> I agree that QC/QA should be an independent body, specifically to ensure a QC/QA professional is always in the building. However, as <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/31623940/' rel="nofollow ugc">@31623940</a> touched on, the responsibilities of QC/QA should not only fall on that body. I would consider&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/quality-control-and-quality-assurance/who-should-be-responsible-for-quality-engineers-or-dedicated-qa-qc-teams/#post-24251" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90a0aedadf906fcc8ebb8c250012cd10</guid>
				<title>enzo.1216 replied to the topic  &#034;Why Product Claims Matter in Medical Device Regulation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/58789/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 01:35:35 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/31623940/' rel="nofollow ugc">@31623940</a> I totally agree. I also wanted to add that I don&#8217;t necessarily think involving regulatory professionals early in the process would unnecessarily slow down development. There may be situations where their involvement does add more time, especially if the&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/regulatory-basics-for-medical-devices/why-product-claims-matter-in-medical-device-regulation/#post-24204" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>