<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | akashranpura | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/akashranpura/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/akashranpura/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning akashranpura.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 22:30:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fc419cb1bc4f204ab582498083fdd627</guid>
				<title>cmassah15 replied to the topic  &#034;Double Blind Vs Single blind Study&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/26253/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 22:26:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/akashranpura/' rel="nofollow ugc">@akashranpura</a> This is true doubled blinding the studies does help to eliminate bias during the trial especially with drug trials. Typically, the clinicians are pressured to show particular positive results and this is where the real issue occurs. I find&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/clinical-research-basics/double-blind-vs-single-blind-study/paged/6/#post-15431" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>