<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | asimbana | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning asimbana.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:02:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a31448d90d7d45817ca381fecf6f739</guid>
				<title>yg385 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Practical vs. Informational courses&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/29497/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:29:23 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> , completely agree. I find it very interesting going through the comments and seeing a slight divide, in that many that are already out of college agree that more practical courses would be better, and some in college are&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/introduction-to-medical-device-development/discussion-topic-practical-vs-informational-courses/paged/9/#post-19708" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e542d38d4c6a586e22ff7a820a48bc3</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Differences between ISO and FDA&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/15192/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 19:03:51 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that ISO provides more flexibility with their definition &#8220;processes for production and service provision where the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measuring. Whereas the FDA has a stricter definition of &#8220;results of&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/process-validation-and-process-risk/discussion-topic-differences-between-iso-and-fda/#post-4864" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1d6c8fedf31ef0036f95294ec2d95435</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Verification vs. Validation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/14833/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 19:00:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @julienneniuya and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that Verification is to confirm that design outputs equals the inputs. That the design numbers/specs set out are accomplished whereas with validation is the confirmation on the end user that the device meets the&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/the-design-history-file/discussion-topic-verification-vs-validation/#post-4505" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6b312a5b3bc93caf77057155f7cccbd</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;When is validation is not required?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/13936/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:09:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with previous posts like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> mentions that validation is important to determine if device meets user needs and it&#8217;s intended use. I like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/williamzembricki/' rel="nofollow ugc">@williamzembricki</a>&#8216;s comment &#8220;When in doubt, validate&#8221;. I agree that it is necessary for most cases&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/when-is-validation-is-not-required/paged/2/#post-3608" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2433adcb9c020e961a58fcac60beff91</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Inc. vs. LLC in the US&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/13399/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:04:35 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @bb224 and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that for a medical device company of mid-size with 50 people and $10 million in revenue they should be an Inc so they have the ability to go public and spark some interest and&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/business-101/discussion-topic-inc-vs-llc-in-the-us/#post-3071" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a7dd432f5f4fa9d39be2cf86edce438e</guid>
				<title>thuytienlecao replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Inc. vs. LLC in the US&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/13378/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:04:25 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/bb254/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bb254</a> and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> about the INC choice over LLC and would like to add more on the CONS. The biggest drawback is the double taxation (C Corp). Also, shareholders that control and own a significant amount, or&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/business-101/discussion-topic-inc-vs-llc-in-the-us/#post-3050" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482b48b16e32b673c04cbd20a15ae99c</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: The cost of Quality&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/13236/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:03:08 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo the sentiments of others like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/bb254/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bb254</a> that QA/QC is necessary and is crucial to the success of products. Spending extra time and money and going through QA/QC processes/methods isn&#8217;t ideal, but it is necessary to lower&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/quality-control-and-quality-assurance/discussion-topic-the-cost-of-quality/#post-2908" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0496277e89904e81e1aed4fc2982804b</guid>
				<title>amandaally1029 replied to the topic  &#034;R&#038;D vs Quality&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/13230/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:03:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a>, both departments have different objectives, which is why you&#8217;d find R&amp;D and Quality on different ends. I think that they both have the right idea, and they are just doing their jobs, but it can be&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/quality-control-and-quality-assurance/rd-vs-quality/#post-2902" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8292ed690b17b6c83812c6b0b06efc21</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Differences between ISO and FDA in the forum Process Validation and Process Risk</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6588/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 19:06:59 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that ISO provides more flexibility with their definition &#8220;processes for production and service provision where the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measuring. Whereas the FDA has a stricter definition of &#8220;results of a process cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection and test&#8221;. As&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6588"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6588/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ebbbf82219e43bcc2ea1a715815be6b</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Verification vs. Validation in the forum The Design History File</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6105/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:25:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @julienneniuya and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that Verification is to confirm that design outputs equals the inputs. That the design numbers/specs set out are accomplished whereas with validation is the confirmation on the end user that the device meets the user needs. When researching industry validation processes, I came across a New York Times&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6105"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6105/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">822739a96f4f20d754f3c27bd8a90463</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic When is validation is not required? in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4947/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:34:11 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with previous posts like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> mentions that validation is important to determine if device meets user needs and it&#8217;s intended use. I like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/williamzembricki/' rel="nofollow ugc">@williamzembricki</a>&#8216;s comment &#8220;When in doubt, validate&#8221;. I agree that it is necessary for most cases especially with medical devices for validation to be done. Validation is key in determining and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4947"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4947/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">84fe0fdc0c99d16c5448d00fd998523d</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Inc. vs. LLC in the US in the forum Business 101</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4071/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 02:49:17 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @bb224 and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> that for a medical device company of mid-size with 50 people and $10 million in revenue they should be an Inc so they have the ability to go public and spark some interest  and attract investors (VCs, etc). The company should be incorporated in Delaware since they have more favorable corporate and tax laws. As <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/thuytienlecao/' rel="nofollow ugc">@thu&hellip;</a><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4071"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4071/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ea4190681b70fad374d60639254c153f</guid>
				<title>thuytienlecao replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Inc. vs. LLC in the US in the forum Business 101</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4040/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:42:03 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/bb254/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bb254</a> and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> about the INC choice over LLC and would like to add more on the CONS. The biggest drawback is the double taxation (C Corp). Also, shareholders that control and own a significant amount, or majority, of the corporation’s voting stock have a dominant voice in the management of the business in comparison to s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4040"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/4040/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">294eb90bedc9fa8412a3b55f4b2b8ab3</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Discussion Topic: The cost of Quality in the forum Quality Control and Quality Assurance</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/3847/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:45:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo the sentiments of others like <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a> and <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/bb254/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bb254</a> that QA/QC is necessary and is crucial to the success of products. Spending extra time and money and going through QA/QC processes/methods isn&#8217;t ideal, but it is necessary to lower risk. For example in 2010 Johnson and Johnson underwent a quality control reorganization after both the House&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3847"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/3847/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">59e2d105e7c51c8b34fb20f9bdc05801</guid>
				<title>amandaally1029 replied to the topic R&#038;D vs Quality in the forum Quality Control and Quality Assurance</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/3836/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:54:00 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/asimbana/' rel="nofollow ugc">@asimbana</a>, both departments have different objectives, which is why you&#8217;d find R&amp;D and Quality on different ends.  I think that they both have the right idea, and they are just doing their jobs, but it can be conflicting when it comes to the actual production and finalizing of products.  These are the types of situations that should&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3836"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/3836/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>