<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | cef3 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/cef3/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/cef3/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for cef3.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 18:41:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f48f8979bfbde492569910bb81e9b3d9</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;NDA vs Patents&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11346/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:44:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is that what you may be working on (as covered by an NDA) may not be sufficient to be apply for a patent. You may in fact be needing work or studies done by a contractor or collaborator&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/consultants-and-legal-basics/nda-vs-patents/#post-1018" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5be4900ef709f052f539b4ba8d4d55b2</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Written Agreement v/s Verbal Agreement&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11340/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:44:03 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest difference between a written and oral contract is that a written contract can easily be defended in court, while an oral one requires additional evidence that can stand up in court. If there is any risk that legal&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/consultants-and-legal-basics/written-agreement-vs-verbal-agreement/#post-1012" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9d90d14ce1b9bafc63633482ef6b6883</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Course conclusion and impressions&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11321/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:43:54 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dr. Simon, when I first signed enrolled in this class, I was expecting it to be really more about medical devices and theory that goes into that. I was kind of caught of guard with how it is really&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/consultants-and-legal-basics/discussion-topic-course-conclusion-and-impressions/#post-993" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">27e4087012a15d6a58549e2038a04ee4</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Forming a Project Team&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11220/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:43:02 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been my experience that project teams are simply made by allocating personnel from each function that have less responsibilities with other projects. Sometimes, people with some expertise or knowledge necessary for the project are pulled in, regardless of their&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/organizational-development-in-device-companies/forming-a-project-team/#post-892" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a28af4b5dab559719f3ac12fdaa6c12</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Your organizational type&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11143/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:40:16 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My work setting seems to fit best as a matrix-type of organization. There are functional departments as well as project teams and project managers. However, while there are projects that involve various departments, there are also projects within departments. There&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/organizational-development-in-device-companies/discussion-topic-your-organizational-type/#post-815" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">317954644a7027dec2645a45e495ec38</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Risk Identification&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11089/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:39:48 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way it was done in my previous job was to use a quality by design matrix. Critical quality attributes (CQAs) were determined based on the design input and then critical development parameters were selected. A risk ranking was then&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/risk-identification/#post-761" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4a739a527554b647507e87d8aa95907</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Risk management methods&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11074/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:39:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two other methods are: Hazard Operability Analysis (HAZOP) &#8211; Based on a theory that assumes that risk events are caused by deviations from the design or operating intentions. It is a systematic brainstorming technique for identifying hazards using so-called guide&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/risk-management-methods/#post-746" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">979dd533fde7c8c2c5fe28a0b75391af</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Expense of Regulations&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11058/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:39:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered about this as well, especially because in academic research I&#8217;ve needed to look at ISO standards and I wasn&#8217;t going to pay for them. I found this information given by ANSI: <a href="https://ansi.org/help/charge_standards.aspx" rel="nofollow ugc">https://ansi.org/help/charge_standards.aspx</a>. It seems it is really just&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/expense-of-regulations/#post-730" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b687fd7ba14571b3aa152596d26df014</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Combination Product Phase I clinical Studies&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10982/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:32 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question, which brings another question to mind: would design transfer activities even have begun at phase I clinical studies? I ask because typically for drugs and biologics, transfer to manufacturing is not done during phase I,&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/combination-product-phase-i-clinical-studies/#post-654" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5ee03bc199ff4d5d3b0d1dc1d27db71d</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Minutes for meetings&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10952/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:15 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only speak to my experience, but generally it&#8217;s been as Roberto pointed out. Nobody really pays much attention to the minutes and they are more just for documentation purposes. The team or project leader always sends out revised&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/minutes-for-meetings/#post-624" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c2ddab6a0ee8db4e00bef58bb6223c52</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Making up tests for design verification and validation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10950/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:14 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If quality by design is used in the development of the product, a simple way to come up with tests for verification/validation is to just use characterization techniques that have been used to measure the critical quality attributes all through&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/making-up-tests-for-design-verification-and-validation/#post-622" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d5737ee2211da508c98bc516b1175f7a</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Design Transfer&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10945/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. For a smaller company, it is usually more cost effective to outsource manufacturing because they rarely have the infrastructure required for production. It is usually larger companies that are producing many products that can justify and afford the&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/design-transfer/#post-617" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e481f658241b51e5bbd18253383ceca</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Design Transfer and Challenges&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10929/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:38:02 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many things can go wrong during transfer. For example, if the design specs heretofore have all been for a product made through a different process and/or scale than what will be used in manufacturing, the release specs may have to&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/design-transfer-and-challenges/#post-601" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ba40c6724be44b69b433c8db69bb435</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Supplemental on DHF and DMR&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10857/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:37:13 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the DHF is superior to the Design Dossier or Tech File in it&#8217;s thoroughness and documentation and that is why there seems to be a move in the EU toward the use of a DHF instead. From&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/discussion-topic-supplemental-on-dhf-and-dmr/#post-529" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">45c538f49cbe28527a0d2139bccdd9a8</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Design Controls for Legacy Combination Products&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10846/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:37:07 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a presentation that was put together by BioTechLogic to address this issue (<a href="http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.casss.org/resource/resmgr/2016_CMCS_TreDenickTracy.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.casss.org/resource/resmgr/2016_CMCS_TreDenickTracy.pdf</a>). It seems like it is a very involved process and I&#8217;ve just listed the major steps below: 1. Quality System Gap Assessment 2. CAPA 3&#8230;. &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/design-controls-for-legacy-combination-products/#post-518" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">420acb6fce3e18704b73451c4cf89367</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;What are Design Controls?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10839/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:37:03 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to add that when revisions are made to the design controls, change control procedures must be followed and documented. The FDA is very strict on this, since good documentation practices require that everything be documented or else it&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/what-are-design-controls/#post-511" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a56c4edb2e4b549699728db88676daf3</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic  &#034;Design input sources&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10838/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:37:02 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that sources of design input would be marketing studies on what type of product is needed, key opinion leaders, and scientific experts. In the lecture, Dr. Simon commented that marketing puts this together through customer opinions and development&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/design-input-sources/#post-510" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e58154849a02342d736fb667bb48f9fa</guid>
				<title>cef3 posted a new topic  &#034;Organization types of medical devices?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10408/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:33:20 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there may be more than just the 3 main organization types that Dr. Simon presented in the lecture: <a href="http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/team-structure-diagrams" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/team-structure-diagrams</a>. Say you were to start up a medical device company that will function worldwide. What type of organization would you&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/organizational-development-in-device-companies/organization-types-of-medical-devices/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a0dcb729fdbd1a807ce829b540de3250</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic NDA vs Patents in the forum Consultants and Legal Basics</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/830/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:43:38 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is that what you may be working on (as covered by an NDA) may not be sufficient to be apply for a patent. You may in fact be needing work or studies done by a contractor or collaborator to have sufficient data or evidence to make the idea patentable or defendable before a patent agency. Thus, an NDA is almost always necessary prior to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-830"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/830/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7490ab61951c9cd7c0b51bf7bc02ee5e</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Written Agreement v/s Verbal Agreement in the forum Consultants and Legal Basics</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/823/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:59:00 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest difference between a written and oral contract is that a written contract can easily be defended in court, while an oral one requires additional evidence that can stand up in court. If there is any risk that legal action can result from the contract, it is probably best to put the agreement in writing. However, if it is not important&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-823"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/823/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0db86e0a6cb81ed1537a8e2d476412aa</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Course conclusion and impressions in the forum Consultants and Legal Basics</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/797/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:11:57 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dr. Simon, when I first signed enrolled in this class, I was expecting it to be really more about medical devices and theory that goes into that. I was kind of caught of guard with how it is really more about how the medical device industry works. That being said, the class is very useful, even for someone like me who has seen some of these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-797"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/797/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d8af486e884d82eadb2241107456ee13</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Forming a Project Team in the forum Organizational Development in Device Companies</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/678/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:28:41 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been my experience that project teams are simply made by allocating personnel from each function that have less responsibilities with other projects. Sometimes, people with some expertise or knowledge necessary for the project are pulled in, regardless of their schedules/responsibilities, but generally I have never seen teams being formed&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-678"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/678/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5a61d46dbe0fabe44cd3127d4f1f60fa</guid>
				<title>cef3 started the topic Organization types of medical devices? in the forum Organizational Development in Device Companies</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/593/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:53:09 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there may be more than just the 3 main organization types that Dr. Simon presented in the lecture: <a href="http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/team-structure-diagrams" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/team-structure-diagrams</a>. Say you were to start up a medical device company that will function worldwide. What type of organization would you choose to instate in your company and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46dedba08d59f3659a327d13d4fbe176</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Your organizational type in the forum Organizational Development in Device Companies</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/585/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:19:13 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My work setting seems to fit best as a matrix-type of organization. There are functional departments as well as project teams and project managers. However, while there are projects that involve various departments, there are also projects within departments. There are also projects within department sub-groups. Because of this complexity, project&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-585"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/585/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c3e3c57932c36ab62885293e4b8d6a0</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Risk Identification in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/506/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:53:15 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way it was done in my previous job was to use a quality by design matrix. Critical quality attributes (CQAs) were determined based on the design input and then critical development parameters were selected. A risk ranking was then assigned to each parameter based on the theoretical knowledge of how the parameter could affect each of the CQAs.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-506"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/506/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">351f00d50832d693655a63a96620bff4</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Risk management methods in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/484/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:20:06 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two other methods are:</p>
<p>Hazard Operability Analysis (HAZOP) &#8211;  Based on a theory that assumes that risk events are caused by deviations from the design or operating intentions. It is a systematic brainstorming technique for identifying hazards using so-called guide words. Guide words (e.g., No, More, Other Than, Part of) are applied to relevant&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-484"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/484/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76e405b8558f28ecf23660b257f59779</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Risk management methods in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/483/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:20:06 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two other methods are:<br />
Hazard Operability Analysis (HAZOP) &#8211;  Based on a theory that assumes that risk events are caused by deviations from the design or operating intentions. It is a systematic brainstorming technique for identifying hazards using so-called guide words. Guide words (e.g., No, More, Other Than, Part of) are applied to relevant&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-483"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/483/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5176d4a36e178c07e07d9829d7166236</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Expense of Regulations in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/462/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:03:21 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered about this as well, especially because in academic research I&#8217;ve needed to look at ISO standards and I wasn&#8217;t going to pay for them. I found this information given by ANSI: <a href="https://ansi.org/help/charge_standards.aspx" rel="nofollow ugc">https://ansi.org/help/charge_standards.aspx</a>. It seems it is really just about the costs associated for the organizations to write, administer, and supply the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-462"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/462/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8ee22cee020c651e1954d3c6a6f5c397</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Combination Product Phase I clinical Studies in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/370/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:29:38 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question, which brings another question to mind: would design transfer activities even have begun at phase I clinical studies? I ask because typically for drugs and biologics, transfer to manufacturing is not done during phase I, since low volumes are needed. Phase I studies are run with very small number of patients, which&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-370"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/370/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e4417784d8919b666a109ac27472a515</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Minutes for meetings in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/326/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:03:45 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only speak to my experience, but generally it&#8217;s been as Roberto pointed out. Nobody really pays much attention to the minutes and they are more just for documentation purposes. The team or project leader always sends out revised timelines with deliverables after every meeting, followed by the minutes. Since we always operate based on what&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-326"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/326/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ed78fc5302fb93e93e36f95206651925</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Making up tests for design verification and validation in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/323/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:50:48 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If quality by design is used in the development of the product, a simple way to come up with tests for verification/validation is to just use characterization techniques that have been used to measure the critical quality attributes all through development. As long as the testing technique is reproducible, scientifically sound, and not complicated&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-323"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/323/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f8a2bf0bbe6faadc6d045b0ac644e4d</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Design Transfer in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/316/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:33:22 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. For a smaller company, it is usually more cost effective to outsource manufacturing because they rarely have the infrastructure required for production. It is usually larger companies that are producing many products that can justify and afford the facilities, equipment, personnel, expertise, etc. for in-house manufacturing.</p>
<p>However,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-316"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/316/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8568cc5b8f456bc8fb302861ed674df7</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Design Transfer and Challenges in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/289/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:04:12 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many things can go wrong during transfer. For example, if the design specs heretofore have all been for a product made through a different process and/or scale than what will be used in manufacturing, the release specs may have to be modified. Testing protocols for specs have to be properly documented and quality control personnel must be properly&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-289"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/289/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b5e97cacb48ce0b2ca7f23bfef2aafe</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Supplemental on DHF and DMR in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/190/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 15:27:17 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the DHF is superior to the Design Dossier or Tech File in it&#8217;s thoroughness and documentation and that is why there seems to be a move in the EU toward the use of a DHF instead.<br />
From the same link that pt58 posted: &#8220;Newer EU regulatory guidance documents are moving the TF/DD more in the direction of the DHF. However, a review of both&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-190"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/190/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e877bc2cb4b1261c1d2df31e8842200</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Design Controls for Legacy Combination Products in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/172/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:15:25 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a presentation that was put together by BioTechLogic to address this issue (<a href="http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.casss.org/resource/resmgr/2016_CMCS_TreDenickTracy.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.casss.org/resource/resmgr/2016_CMCS_TreDenickTracy.pdf</a>). It seems like it is a very involved process and I&#8217;ve just listed the major steps below:<br />
1. Quality System Gap Assessment<br />
2. CAPA<br />
3. Form Cross Functional Team<br />
4. Develop “Device F&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-172"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/172/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8667a8c2ad97c052a9d1e467d2bf2118</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic What are Design Controls? in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/160/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:29:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to add that when revisions are made to the design controls, change control procedures must be followed and documented. The FDA is very strict on this, since good documentation practices require that everything be documented or else it didn&#8217;t happen. Furthermore, change controls require valid justification and cannot just be executed&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-160"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/160/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4fca7ecb4d8e3f789e97babd45be14b4</guid>
				<title>cef3 replied to the topic Design input sources in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/159/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:20:41 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that sources of design input would be marketing studies on what type of product is needed, key opinion leaders, and scientific experts. In the lecture, Dr. Simon commented that marketing puts this together through customer opinions and development team input. Design inputs can be such things as how the device should function, how long it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-159"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/159/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>