<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | dcapera | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/dcapera/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/dcapera/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning dcapera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 11:42:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8e4997f950cc3b8a03f3e20daef3475</guid>
				<title>Sid replied to the topic  &#034;Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/60463/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:38:59 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/dcapera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@dcapera</a> I agree that FMEA is best as a cross-functional effort, and your analysis of what teams can contribute in specific ways is very accurate. Engineers know most about design intent, but manufacturing can see failures that engineers would not&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/failure-mode-and-effects-analysis-fmea/#post-24683" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">48ef9a6fdb8ddc349c6673b3d4644e3e</guid>
				<title>enzo.1216 replied to the topic  &#034;Can Product Claims Make Things More Complicated?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/58785/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 01:11:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/dcapera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@dcapera</a> I see your point, and after thinking about it more, I agree that starting with fewer claims probably makes more sense. My initial thought was that it might be more efficient to make broader claims from the beginning rather&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/regulatory-basics-for-medical-devices/can-product-claims-make-things-more-complicated/#post-24201" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>