<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | f-dot | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning f-dot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 18:57:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2c39bc88504c1073bd70e10e1d5935bf</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Categorization of Medical Devices&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/16053/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 19:16:35 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/' rel="nofollow ugc">@f-dot</a>, I agree that the FDA does have to stay on top of modern day devices applications, but don&#8217;t think modern day technologies need a different classification system. I think it is still useful to a classification system based on&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-project-management/categorization-of-medical-devices/#post-5725" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">588df299f091dae077a2425cd38ef3b9</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic  &#034;Your Ideas about How to prepare/write a Successful Project Proposal&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/14846/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 19:00:43 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @iala4 that important sections to include are 1. Background 2. Objective 3. Scope 4. Time frame 5. Project budget 6.Key stakeholder. I also agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/' rel="nofollow ugc">@f-dot</a> that a realistic budget and timeline are key. With the projects&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-project-management/your-ideas-about-how-to-prepare-write-a-successful-project-proposal/#post-4518" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6deb16f0d4ca6a96624255dc50fab3a4</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Categorization of Medical Devices in the forum Introduction to Project Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/7634/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 19:06:49 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/' rel="nofollow ugc">@f-dot</a>, I agree that the FDA does have to stay on top of modern day devices applications, but don&#8217;t think modern day technologies need a different classification system. I think it is still useful to a classification system based on risk, Class I, Class II, and Class III devices. I think they could maybe include more guidance documents regarding&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7634"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/7634/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d1231eadab5f89dc7eaca07fc4ccc61</guid>
				<title>alexandrabuga replied to the topic Your Ideas about How to prepare/write a Successful Project Proposal in the forum Introduction to Project Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6116/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 20:33:34 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @iala4 that important sections to include are 1. Background 2. Objective 3. Scope 4. Time frame 5. Project budget 6.Key stakeholder. I also agree with <a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/f-dot/' rel="nofollow ugc">@f-dot</a> that a realistic budget and timeline are key. With the projects that I deal with if we contract out the development we look for the company to provide an extensive timeline with&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6116"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/6116/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>