<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | jdfoster01 | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jdfoster01/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jdfoster01/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning jdfoster01.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:37:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">88c4162218430801fb32e5315e0d4a18</guid>
				<title>cmassah15 replied to the topic  &#034;Double Blind Vs Single blind Study&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/26254/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 22:33:48 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jdfoster01/' rel="nofollow ugc">@jdfoster01</a> I agree with you on the double blind protocol and it being the gold standard of Clinical Research today. I&#8217;m curious how the triple blind studies compare to the double blind trials. I wonder if the validity of the&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/clinical-research-basics/double-blind-vs-single-blind-study/paged/6/#post-15432" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>