<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | jmeghai | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jmeghai/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jmeghai/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning jmeghai.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 03:17:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fea9d6d884c037d288249f46a3471998</guid>
				<title>jaf22 replied to the topic  &#034;Best timing for validation and verification&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/21164/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:50:26 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/jmeghai/' rel="nofollow ugc">@jmeghai</a> I agree that there should be a thought on verification in the early stages of development, but I don&#8217;t agree that products should be verified too early on in the project itself. Issues such as scope creep and design&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/forums/introduction-to-project-management/best-timing-for-validation-and-verification/paged/3/#post-10668" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>