<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medical Device Courses | tme3 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/tme3/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/members/tme3/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for tme3.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:17:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">43a215045cdea942105e2226e8026377</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;CROs&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12527/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:56:46 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a CRO can usually over an objective assessment to a company when it comes to its drug/device and the resultant outcomes. CROs are usually well versed in conducting and managing clinical trials set forth by a company. This is&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/clinical-trials-for-medical-devices/cros/#post-2199" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">acd9d5a45c1752883e808b4b0c124e50</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Clinical Study Location/cost vs. results&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12525/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:56:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting costs in clinical trials is a big plus especially for pharma companies that choose to outsource clinical trials overseas. According to the article listed below, India has become a popular location in conducting these clinical trials due to the&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/clinical-trials-for-medical-devices/clinical-study-locationcost-vs-results/#post-2197" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0e6ff8383b170fa0a8db57adeb01e86d</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Internal Audits for small organizations&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12442/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:56:05 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, a contractor is usually hired or an external auditor is hired for such occasions. This is standard practice if no resources are made available from within the organization. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0041d10e2be14579229f5a5ea318082a</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Audits&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12441/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:56:04 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that internal audits can help streamline a business and find problems that perhaps a lax enviornment has perpetuated. Internal audits are more effeicient and can help spot problems in application of SOPs, safety hazards or even documentation control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65a83144ab188b3cdf3f94504a3db796</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: When Quality Systems change in the middle of a project&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12350/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55:12 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that existing product and documentation should be grandfathered in, since the time and money to extend these changes could lead down a many different paths and endless changes, revisions and updates. Projects that have been started already should&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/quality-systems-management/discussion-topic-when-quality-systems-change-in-the-middle-of-a-project/#post-2022" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0e18b4930a079eceb682f4d4dfb8505e</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;No GMPs&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12349/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55:12 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel GMPs purpose is noble, but in practice it is more of a hassle to a company rather than a benefit to a consumer. GMPs can force companies to take the necessary measures, but I feel that most companies&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/quality-systems-management/no-gmps/#post-2021" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60a757bfcbfc873a7a0bff79fa2f4101</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Vagueness of GMP&#039;s&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/12347/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:55:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the ambiguity does just that, provide a framework for these companies. Since there is at least a base in place, each company can then place their own quality and SOP in order to comply to GMP&#8217;s. Each business/company&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/quality-systems-management/discussion-topic-vagueness-of-gmps/#post-2019" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9b78704b94a5c18bf04d0bf231b87b8f</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Types of Validation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11967/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:51:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting form of validation I have performed before is surgeon validation as the end user. Working with specialty medical instruments, our clients were the physicians who gave us specifics of each individual instrument or implant. This could range from&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/process-validation-and-process-risk/types-of-validation/#post-1639" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a7642052765f3920d9f28f2f422a506a</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Playing with IQ, OQ, PQ&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11966/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:51:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Viraj, I agree with your approach but I believe you can to the following points: IQ &#8211; In addition to the manuals, you should call out maintenance and calibration schedules as well as procedural protocols for the entire process&#8230;. &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/process-validation-and-process-risk/discussion-topic-playing-with-iq-oq-pq/#post-1638" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d46d244d318d4d5383854ca261165757</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Process Revalidation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11965/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:51:30 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had similar experiences when moving manufacturing and assembling from one facility to another. Quality will always call for a complete validation for all aspects of the process moving. While you can and successfully argue with and rationalize certain aspects&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/process-validation-and-process-risk/process-revalidation/#post-1637" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">24077f3415b55e5525429b98efc504cb</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;DHF vs. DHR&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11831/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:50:10 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many have already commented on both DHF and DHR, the FDA actually has some form of DHR database with the new GUDID and UDI initiative. This maintains manufacturing, sterilization, QC as well as produced quantities of any specific lot&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/device-documentation/dhf-vs-dhr/#post-1503" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9316691a50c1c9016e4d59ab24c8dc34</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Standard Operating Procedures (SOP&#039;s)&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11830/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:50:10 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the product or process is still in a research phase or even development phase an SOP is needed either way. This is to ensure the tests are as repeatable as possible as was stated above and also to ensure&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/device-documentation/standard-operating-procedures-sops/#post-1502" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78b381f43ee33fdcf7694ea2681450bb</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;SOP: how much detail before too much detail?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11829/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:50:09 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I see this all the time on both ends of the spectrum when reviewing SOPs. There are protocols that lack any clear directions and leave much of the interpretation up to the test engineer while others leave very little&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/device-documentation/sop-how-much-detail-before-too-much-detail/#post-1501" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0028622e208d84075537198eefddc2bf</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Regression Verification and Validation&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11703/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:48:52 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an failed V&amp;V testing portion of a new product could point to many factors such as poor design, test method, test operators or as you suggested a product simply not able to meet a spec. If a root-cause analysis&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/the-design-history-file/regression-verification-and-validation/#post-1375" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4a0f09f911825f270e483e0336f038e</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Is the DHF a living document?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11676/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:48:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the DHF should be a living document. This is due to the fact that many other components of a product may be interlinked. If any part of this product were to change, the DHF should be updated&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/the-design-history-file/discussion-topic-is-the-dhf-a-living-document/#post-1348" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cecf8a3d27f37484d631665b0472adb4</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;DHF vs. Tech File/Design Dossier&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11675/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:48:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the DHF to be more valuable than the dossier. I base this off the fact that the DHF is fully auditable by the FDA. Everything from the customer need, risk analysis, design input and output, drawings and verification&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/the-design-history-file/dhf-vs-tech-filedesign-dossier/#post-1347" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46e3b68b36f3617a1d23056eeaa0b72a</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Course conclusion and impressions&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11335/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:44:01 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This course has been very helpful in looking at some of the other areas of the medical device industry that I have not been exposed to. Not only that, but the interaction between other students with lab experience or work&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/consultants-and-legal-basics/discussion-topic-course-conclusion-and-impressions/#post-1007" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d8fc6fc5988e9aedc3ce7de0df64f97</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Your organizational type&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11203/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:40:59 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, I work for a company that employs the functional organization structure. This helps in allowing all the smaller specialized groups to focus on our certain tasks at any specific point of a project. For instance, in R&amp;D I’m solely&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/organizational-development-in-device-companies/discussion-topic-your-organizational-type/#post-875" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ace6fe5f16dfd41a9fae899f4d5de95</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Organization types of medical devices?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11201/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:40:57 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Looking at these different types, the last one in particular stands out to me for certain reasons. First, the fact that the directorate have an influential vision that is applied across the company and its different branches. This circular&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/organizational-development-in-device-companies/organization-types-of-medical-devices/#post-873" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">574e890dbef9c7721fdbc13ec30643a4</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Expense of Regulations&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11060/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:39:32 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with your suggestion of subscribing to a database rather than buying documents one off. This creates a much more sustainable business model for these organizations by ensuring that subscribers will always have access to these articles&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/expense-of-regulations/#post-732" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d963fb59ce8f2cb9814c6305c8dd8cc6</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Risk analysis in real company&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/11059/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:39:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately I have had the opportunity to sit in on risk analysis session for a new product. The amount of time and effort that goes into creating the EURA’s (End User Risk Analysis) is very great. There are many different&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/risk-analysis-for-medical-devices/risk-analysis-in-real-company/#post-731" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c436a39c4419a7205719d65183b2a50</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;What are Design Controls?&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10813/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:36:49 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting standpoint on design control is that they protect against product liability of design defect. Design defect is concerned with claiming the safety of the product is in doubt and that the route taken to design said product, neglected&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/what-are-design-controls/#post-485" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f48c0939332964485648d15f93db1a86</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Important Part of DDP&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10812/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:36:48 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its difficult to pinpoint a single portion of a DDP to be as the most crucial as all portions are critical to a project&#8217;s success. To answer your question, a gantt chart is a very important in terms&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/important-part-of-ddp/#post-484" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6710c8942f72d170cdd71df4812282e0</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic  &#034;Discussion Topic: Supplemental on DHF and DMR&#034; -</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/10807/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 16:36:46 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, while a DHF is not needed for an EU release product, design controls are still an integral part of the process and are still integral. While that may be the case, I believe any company looking to expand its&#8230; &nbsp; <a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/community/introduction-to-design-controls/discussion-topic-supplemental-on-dhf-and-dmr/#post-479" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more&raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c224e0ea76816d2f4f273151ad92806e</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic CROs in the forum Clinical Trials for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2429/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:12:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a CRO can usually over an objective assessment to a company when it comes to its drug/device and the resultant outcomes. CROs are usually well versed in conducting and managing clinical trials set forth by a company. This is usually a better round to recieve sound and unbiased feedback and regulated control of a clinical trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">09a5f99c5f037aa51b3fcc390357eafa</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Clinical Study Location/cost vs. results in the forum Clinical Trials for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2427/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:59:01 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting costs in clinical trials is a big plus especially for pharma companies that choose to outsource clinical trials overseas. According to the article listed below, India has become a popular location in conducting these clinical trials due to the cost, about 20-60% if done locally.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2427"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2427/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2f10868495e5d9c01fbd049d396328ce</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Internal Audits for small organizations in the forum Quality Systems Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2311/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 03:52:15 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, a contractor is usually hired or an external auditor is hired for such occasions. This is standard practice if no resources are made available from within the organization. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b822427464c411a9c9163111c7e1d9c2</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Audits in the forum Quality Systems Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2310/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 03:47:49 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that internal audits can help streamline a business and find problems that perhaps a lax enviornment has perpetuated. Internal audits are more effeicient and can help spot problems in application of SOPs, safety hazards or even documentation control. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e02c4e64d837abefbcb3b0ec2f7f9ad8</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic:  When Quality Systems change in the middle of a project in the forum Quality Systems Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2202/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:30:59 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that existing product and documentation should be grandfathered in, since the time and money to extend these changes could lead down a many different paths and endless changes, revisions and updates. Projects that have been started already should be assessed on a case by case basis. A risk analysis should be done to determine if these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2202"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2202/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6e98e0eb525ad9c159f60ac90a13187</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic No GMPs in the forum Quality Systems Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2201/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:27:59 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel GMPs purpose is noble, but in practice it is more of a hassle to a company rather than a benefit to a consumer. GMPs can force companies to take the necessary measures, but I feel that most companies today adhere to these standards regardless of GMPs. this can be a result of the existing framework or maybe this is necessary to keep these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2201"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2201/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8337cb552fc1dc42fef00a6dfd31606f</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Vagueness of GMP&#039;s in the forum Quality Systems Management</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2198/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:16:54 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the ambiguity does just that, provide a framework for these companies. Since there is at least a base in place, each company can then place their own quality and SOP in order to comply to GMP&#8217;s. Each business/company is different in its manufacturing process and products, so applying a strict set of rules would hinder growth in the industry&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2198"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/2198/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">573a2384f250171c9e1e9e75b46ca8d7</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Types of Validation in the forum Process Validation and Process Risk</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1712/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:18:19 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting form of validation I have performed before is surgeon validation as the end user. Working with specialty medical instruments, our clients were the physicians who gave us specifics of each individual instrument or implant. This could range from custom sizes, to longer/short instruments or even something as simple as changing a grip&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1712"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1712/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d226b4324356fc26b6144e9301216b4f</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Playing with IQ, OQ, PQ in the forum Process Validation and Process Risk</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1711/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:14:34 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Viraj,</p>
<p>I agree with your approach but I believe you can to the following points:</p>
<p>IQ &#8211; In addition to the manuals, you should call out maintenance and calibration schedules as well as procedural protocols for the entire process.</p>
<p>OQ- I believe the OQ should determine your maximum operational window for two things, the application of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1711"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1711/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f603a937f6117e8f8752f6fa6280e157</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Process Revalidation in the forum Process Validation and Process Risk</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1710/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:05:32 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had similar experiences when moving manufacturing and assembling from one facility to another. Quality will always call for a complete validation for all aspects of the process moving. While you can and successfully argue with and rationalize certain aspects of a complete revalidation, I believe it is always worth mitigating risk and going&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1710"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1710/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfd1cf36bb2860cdb08b63f849735c89</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic DHF vs. DHR in the forum Device Documentation</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1536/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:50:27 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many have already commented on both DHF and DHR, the FDA actually has some form of DHR database with the new GUDID and UDI initiative. This maintains manufacturing, sterilization, QC as well as produced quantities of any specific lot number of 1 time use medical devices or the complete traceability of implants and multi-use medical devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4d898fa1fbfa3f0546d522d9799a9776</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Standard Operating Procedures (SOP&#039;s) in the forum Device Documentation</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1535/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:47:36 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the product or process is still in a research phase or even development phase an SOP is needed either way. This is to ensure the tests are as repeatable as possible as was stated above and also to ensure that a documented test method is available to go hand in hand with any applicable results. This allows the SOP to develop along side the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1535"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1535/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9fd8cd1d80f74ce211ad1bb21d93f0df</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic SOP:  how much  detail before too much detail? in the forum Device Documentation</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1534/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:43:12 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I see this all the time on both ends of the spectrum when reviewing SOPs. There are protocols that lack any clear directions and leave much of the interpretation up to the test engineer while others leave very little room for any sort of deviation. In my experience, the more detail the better since the procedure must be repeatable for any&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1534"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1534/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9c6986e155956473f42b6b92bd4cc90a</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Regression Verification and Validation in the forum The Design History File</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1360/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 22:46:09 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an failed V&amp;V testing portion of a new product could point to many factors such as poor design, test method, test operators or as you suggested a product simply not able to meet a spec. If a root-cause analysis of these failures indicate that the cause of the problem is indeed the spec, then it is early enough in the life of the product to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1360"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1360/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">91dbe845881df274e470e57d54d82ce8</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Is the DHF a living document? in the forum The Design History File</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1329/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:58:12 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the DHF should be a living document. This is due to the fact that many other components of a product may be interlinked. If any part of this product were to change, the DHF should be updated to reflect this. Whether it be a material change, a tolerance adjustment or a simple process parameter update all these are minor (or major!)&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1329"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1329/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f26171647f0259f000129b6f6f2e2e6</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic DHF vs. Tech File/Design Dossier in the forum The Design History File</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1328/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:54:09 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the DHF to be more valuable than the dossier. I base this off the fact that the DHF is fully auditable by the FDA. Everything from the customer need, risk analysis, design input and output, drawings and verification and validation. These are very valuable in terms of building a product from start to finish with all the associated files.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1328"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/1328/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2524ac533a022e0c179c3fb661086a2</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Course conclusion and impressions in the forum Consultants and Legal Basics</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/814/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:56:27 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This course has been very helpful in looking at some of the other areas of the medical device industry that I have not been exposed to. Not only that, but the interaction between other students with lab experience or work experience has helped in giving me different perspectives on certain issues. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7ea20a4eb05b8b1bb6ee71d36c8ecac8</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Your organizational type in the forum Organizational Development in Device Companies</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/656/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:33:31 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, I work for a company that employs the functional organization structure. This helps in allowing all the smaller specialized groups to focus on our certain tasks at any specific point of a project. For instance, in R&amp;D I’m solely engrossed in working and developing any direct engineering work for said project. What I mean by this is, I h&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-656"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/656/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6796b8a5bf50a7caea095ad969f4fc80</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Organization types of medical devices? in the forum Organizational Development in Device Companies</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/654/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:56:59 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Looking at these different types, the last one in particular stands out to me for certain reasons. First, the fact that the directorate have an influential vision that is applied across the company and its different branches.  This circular organization also allows for sharing of workload and responsibility between different divisions of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-654"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/654/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c729aa20a1c04c31fccde16f115939f</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Expense of Regulations in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/464/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:27:53 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with your suggestion of subscribing to a database rather than buying documents one off. This creates a much more sustainable business model for these organizations by ensuring that subscribers will always have access to these articles and the subscriber will continue to pay an annual fee. In theory this should fund future work on&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-464"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/464/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bef7955c3f98e5d4f217a53639822ce3</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Risk analysis in real company in the forum Risk Analysis for Medical Devices</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/463/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:21:45 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately I have had the opportunity to sit in on risk analysis session for a new product. The amount of time and effort that goes into creating the EURA’s (End User Risk Analysis) is very great. There are many different functions to look at when it comes to creating your EURA’s such as Process, Design, and Application. Like you mentioned bef&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-463"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/463/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5749f36db10e63d50dc9255c7aee5596</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic What are Design Controls? in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/105/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:06:07 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting standpoint on design control is that they protect against product liability of design defect. Design defect is concerned with claiming the safety of the product is in doubt and that the route taken to design said product, neglected to account for product safety or make a safer design. With the use of design control, specifically&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-105"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/105/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">caafcf76c2f442f2dc3520e2c64e6a3b</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Important Part of DDP in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/104/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:00:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its difficult to pinpoint a single portion of a DDP to be as the most crucial as all portions are critical to a project&#8217;s success. To answer your question, a gantt chart is a very important in terms of outlining the tasks related to the project, the responsible party for each portion as well as the expected timeline to completion. The&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-104"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/104/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">38842e291cc91f43f569c1b998f457e5</guid>
				<title>tme3 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Supplemental on DHF and DMR in the forum Introduction to Design Controls</title>
				<link>https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/93/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:50:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, while a DHF is not needed for an EU release product, design controls are still an integral part of the process and are still integral. While that may be the case, I believe any company looking to expand its platform to an international level, can always beneifit from &#8220;over documentation&#8221; and having a DHF on hand and constantly updated. This&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93"><a href="https://medicaldevicecourses.com/activity/p/93/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>