A small reimbursement of $100, I believe, is a good reimbursement for a doctor’s time that compensates the doctor without creating a meaningful conflict of interest. While the exact amount can be debated, a compensation that is insignificant in comparison to the doctor’s salary is a good way to minimize any risk of bribery, or even the appearance of bribery. For this reason, I also am pleased to see that even a doctor’s partner’s meal isn’t covered, as it closes a loophole that is easy to take advantage of.

A better law, In my opinion, would, however, tie the amount to inflation. $100 was worth quite a bit more in 2010 than it is now, and it will continue to be worth less over time. Until or unless the law is revised – a process that is slow at best given increasing amounts of partisan deadlock – the amount it covers is inconsistent.

Regardless of the amount, I am also happy to see that contributions must be reported when over $25. This gives power to patients and allows them to consider any influences a doctor may have when suggesting a certain drug, device, or procedure. On the whole, I believe the law is reasonable about this matter.