Somehow this topic interests me. Especially when participant nk229, posting coded 1461 seeks to express the dilemma of attempting to assess pharmaceutical drug risks as a major concern. That it is a concern, is actually an understatement. It is possible to work with risks associated with a medical device; but not with pharmaceutical items put out for human consumption. It is simply impossible to assess the risks of taking pharmaceutical drugs.

It is true the FDA puts pharmaceutical drug items through some sort scrutiny after which they are pronounced fit for marketing.

This is probably the worst job the FDA ever does and until pharmaceutical drug sales is prohibited, the FDA should be held responsible for the danger of letting very dangerous, often deadly, chemical fabrications put out for human consumption in the name of medicinal drugs. To say the least, one’s health is in jeopardy each time one of those drugs in ingested.

Yes a great deal of chemical engineering is involved in the design of these drugs, but the last thing these chemical engineers understand is how the body really functions and this includes the so-called physicians who assist in their distribution (sales).

The body only works with something natural; i.e., one whose presence in the body is not questioned by the immune system; one the immune system does not fight to expel from the body [triggering such phenomena as reaction against drugs].

Not a single drug will help a patient get healed; i.e., freed from a disease. If in doubt study the healing practices of a physician – Dr. Gonzalez of New York City killed by mainstream medical practice. He was able to cure, yes! “cure” cancer using pancreatic hormones.

See the use of Frequency Specific Modulation to correct tissue problems by Dr. McMakin of Portland Oregon. These are only simple examples of people using nature to effect disease cure in the human body.

Briefly, the risk of taking pharmaceutical drugs is immeasurable; let alone the attempt to mitigate then.