Forum

Notifications
Clear all

Role of clinical trials for medical devices & pharmaceuticals

4 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
54 Views
(@samiha-khan)
Posts: 21
Eminent Member
Topic starter
 

Clinical trials are necessary for the approval of both medicines and medical devices. However, there are major variations in the design, scale, and scope of device trials. Identifying the differences in clinical trial prerequisites according to device risk class and planned use will help organizations in crafting more efficient study designs and submissions. In this context, what role do clinical trials play in the approval process for medical devices, and how do the requirements differ from those of pharmaceuticals?

 
Posted : 29/09/2024 3:53 pm
(@bsk32)
Posts: 21
Eminent Member
 

For higher class devices, more extensive clinical trials are needed to investigate the risk and effectiveness of a new device. For class 1 and 2 devices, they must go through clinical trials to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety. For the Class 3 devices, they will go through pivotal trials, since they need to demonstrate to the FDA a new technology's effectiveness, and how it mitigates risk factors. Unlike class 1 and 2, where the technology is very similar to a predicate model and may only require few trials to demonstrate its effectiveness, a class 3 device is designated as novel, and throughout history, novel technology and devices have been shown to cause undesired side-effects, and/or no effectiveness at all. That's why the FDA passed strict Class 3 trial procedures for new medical devices to show its safety and effectiveness, before requiring a pre-market approval.

 
Posted : 29/09/2024 4:21 pm
(@michael_patel)
Posts: 13
Active Member
 

Hi samiha-khan,

I stumbled upon your post and it made me realize and think about something that I had learned in another one of my classes. First let me answer the question you proposed. Clinical trials are crucial for medical device approval because they show if a device is safe and its efficacy. These trials differ from those for pharmaceuticals since device trials are risk-based and require more to be done dependent on what class (I,II,III) they are in. Drug trials are stricter which brings me to a story about thalidomide, The tragedy that happened in the US was due to a polymorph which is what makes pharma trials super strict. The FDA only approves one crystalline form so there must be a lot of proof to prevent the potential effects of a polymorphic drug. 

 
Posted : 29/09/2024 11:40 pm
(@zeinab-amoabediny)
Posts: 35
Eminent Member
 

Interesting question. Clinical trials are crucial to getting both medicines and medical devices approved. However, when it comes to medical devices, the trials can vary greatly depending on the device's class and how it's intended to be used. Higher-risk devices need more rigorous and extensive testing, while lower-risk ones might have simpler trials. This flexibility helps companies design more efficient studies and submissions based on the specific device. In contrast, pharmaceutical trials are usually more standardized and require longer, larger-scale studies to test the drug and its effectiveness across different populations.

 
Posted : 30/09/2024 6:41 pm
Samiha Khan reacted
Share: