-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: The cost of Quality in the forum Quality Control and Quality Assurance 7 years, 10 months ago
I agree with the general consensus in the above posts that the quality assurance process and quality control process is very important to ensure a device will be safe and reliable for the end user. However, I also agree with those who view the quality processes to be burdensome as well. Speaking from experience, the quality department seems to…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic FDA on Recalled Items in the forum Regulatory Basics for Medical Devices 7 years, 10 months ago
I recently worked on a product that was recalled voluntarily by our company. I want to make the distinction between a voluntary recall and an FDA mandated recall. A voluntary recall is when a company’s post market surveillance of a product shows that there are recurring problems that they feel are a risk to the patient and therefore they…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: The de Novo 510(k) Process in the forum Regulatory Basics for Medical Devices 7 years, 10 months ago
A de Novo is a classification process using a risk-based strategy for new, novel devices that have not been classified as of yet. The new ruling in 2014 streamlined the process by creating an alternative pathway that does not require submission of a 510k prior to a de novo request. Prior to this ruling, companies would have to submit a 510k, FDA…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Revamping the 510(k) Process in the forum Regulatory Basics for Medical Devices 7 years, 10 months ago
The question was raised whether the current 510(k) process is ensuring that the medical devices released to the market are safe and effective. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) investigated this question and found that the current 510(k) process is flawed based on its legislative foundation. One of their findings was that when the FDA assesses the…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Academia vs. Industry Research in the forum Pre-clinical Device Development 7 years, 10 months ago
I work in Product Development, and what I would say is that in industry, timing can determine the success or failure of a product, therefore I believe that industrial research is approached in a different way. Taking the example of an animal study, in academic research, if there is a delay, the research group may just have to accept that delay…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Beyond experimental design issues in the forum Pre-clinical Device Development 7 years, 11 months ago
First of all, I think that the decision to outsource to this university just because a team member has connections there is a poor decision. In a best case scenario (which is probably what was assumed when making this decision), the team member will have more leverage with the lab to make sure they run the test exactly as planned and on time.…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Brand new biomaterial in the forum Pre-clinical Device Development 7 years, 11 months ago
As the others have mentioned already, referencing the Toxicity Table from ISO 10993, there are different tests required for different applications. Therefore, if you know what application you are planning to use the biomaterial for, you just reference the corresponding row in the toxicity table to determine what testing will be required. Several…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Obstacles while working on a project in the forum Intro to Project Management 7 years, 11 months ago
I worked on a project that was so volatile during the execution phase that it really did not follow any plan, and eventually it was cancelled. It really was a complete failure. One of the main contributing factors was that the planning phase was pretty much overlooked. It was an acquisition, not an NPD project, therefore it was not treated the…[Read more]
-
srg36 started the topic Multiple Project Managers for one project in the forum Intro to Project Management 7 years, 11 months ago
I’m wondering if any of you have experience working on a project where there were multiple project managers who each were responsible for different portions of the project rather than just one project manager who managed the entire project. If so, please share your experience. If not, what do you think about this?
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Project Management in a medical device setting in the forum Intro to Project Management 7 years, 11 months ago
Many of the posts above mention the regulatory aspect of project management as a greater challenge in the medical device industry. I do agree with this, but I would like to expand on what ao242 mentioned about globalization. Many companies develop medical devices to sell globally, and in that case, not only do they have to conform to FDA…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Professions in Academia and the Industry in the forum Introduction to Medical Device Development 7 years, 11 months ago
I have been working as a Product Development Engineer for 2 years in the medical device industry. My team is focused on designing implants and instruments for spine surgery. Overall, I really enjoy my work. Although certain projects that I have worked on have not been so enjoyable, looking at the big picture, I am satisfied with my career thus…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Academia vs. Industry in the forum Introduction to Medical Device Development 7 years, 11 months ago
I have only been working in industry, so I cannot speak to the differences between academia and industry. However, I can speak to what I have experienced in industry. My job is very structured, in that I am assigned to a project(s) and have specific parts of the project that I am responsible for. It is also structured in the sense that we work…[Read more]
-
srg36 replied to the topic Discussion Topic: Practical vs. Informational courses in the forum Introduction to Medical Device Development 7 years, 11 months ago
I think that the answer to this question is highly dependent on the individual, depending on what they are looking to get out of their MS degree. For me personally, I think that a 50/50 ratio would be better, and that is because I am working in industry, and I am looking to gain knowledge that will help me perform better in my current job. I would…[Read more]
-
srg36 became a registered member 7 years, 11 months ago