When it comes to a projects organization and culture, they can play a huge role in the success of the project. Organization is very key in a project as it allows for the project manager and the other department to stay on track for deadlines and documentation of the project as a whole. By doing so it allow for there to be a clearer line of communication and dictation of what is needed and done with the project so far. it can lead to the project to go smoothly and efficiently. Now when it come to culture, it also plays a key role as well. One of the things that can be the difference between a good project and a bad project is the culture of the team and how they are able to work together. If the culture is not good and everyone is hostile to one another, it creates for anamosity and can slow or even delay the projects and it deadline that need to be met. If the culture is good, everyone is will to work and communicate with one another allowing the process to go a lot smoother. Overall both organization and culture are key when it comes to the success of the project and allows for the project to go smoothly and efficiently with little to no problems. 

Organizational culture and structure are closely connected because structure sets the framework for how people interact, while culture determines the attitudes and behaviors within that framework. When a structure encourages open communication and shared responsibility, it often creates a culture where team members feel supported and willing to collaborate. In contrast, a rigid structure can reinforce a culture where people hesitate to speak up or take initiative. This directly affects project outcomes because teams rely on both clear processes and a healthy environment to solve problems quickly and stay aligned. A composite structure can be effective for many projects because it brings together diverse expertise and improves cross functional coordination. These advantages make it useful for critical projects, but they can also benefit routine projects if the organization has the culture to support shared decision making and clear communication. A question I am curious about is whether a strong culture can compensate for weaknesses in structure. In other words, do you guys think a highly collaborative team still succeed even if the formal structure is inefficient, or does structure eventually limit how far that team can go?